Looper's Delight Archive Top (Search)
Date Index
Thread Index
Author Index
Support
Looper's
Delight!!

Looper's Delight Home
Mailing List Info
Looper's Delight
Looper Profiles
Tools of the Trade
Tips and Tricks
Musings
History of Looping
Loopography
Rec. Reading
Mailing List Info
Mailing List Archive
File Library

Support
Looper's Delight!
In Association with Amazon.com

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Looperlative LP1 - sample rate



The way I understand this is that with 2 points you can find the "sine 
equation" at this limit frequency.
As you don't hear the harmonics, it doesn't matter if its a sine, a square 
or a saw, you just hear the first harmonic anyway.
I guess it's a bit simplist but ...

Ben.




----- Original Message ----- 
From: "S V G" <vsyevolod@yahoo.com>
To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 10:38 AM
Subject: Re: Looperlative LP1 - sample rate


>
>     Even though higher frequencies are indeed possible with a 192K 
> sampling rate, it also means
> that each waveform has more samples representing it, thus higher 
>fidelity. 
> I never did understand
> how the Nyquist theorum could claim fidelity in the upper end by only 
> having two samples per
> waveform.  Seems to me like you wouldn't be able to distinguish a 
>sawtooth 
> from a sine from a
> square wave if you only sampled at twice the highest frequency.
>
>     Then there's the whole argument of higher frequencies not being 
> perceived by the human ear
> and yet still being perceived somehow...  Same with extra low 
>frequencies. 
> Can we hear below 20
> Hz?  Probably not.  Can we perceive below 20 Hz?  Hell yes.
>
>     Stephen
>
>
>     R.Chris Murphy wrote:
> The current sample rate of Looperlative is
> 48k (48,000 samples per second) which is already higher than a
> commercial CD (although I would vote for it being the same a commercial
> CD). This in theory should reproduce frequencies up to 24 kilohertz
> already. To put that into some perspective most guitar cabinets start
> to roll off around 8k. Ignoring for the valid arguments about bone
> conduction etc, its pretty safe to say that any guy that has been in a
> rock band for a few years do not hear much about 15k, and even those of
> us that have taken pretty good care of our ears do not really hear much
> about 20k, if even that.
>
> A sampling rate of 192k would reproduce frequencies up to about 96k,
> beyond what a dog could hear. as a live performance tool I would gladly
> take the extra time ('cause I am one of those long droney loopers ;-)
>
> ________________
> Ronan Chris Murphy
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
> 


        

        
                
___________________________________________________________________________
 
Nouveau : téléphonez moins cher avec Yahoo! Messenger ! Découvez les 
tarifs exceptionnels pour appeler la France et l'international.
Téléchargez sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com


Archive Top (Search) | Thread Index | Author Index
Looper's Delight Home | Looper's Delight Mailing List Info
This page is maintained by Kim Flint
contact us
Support
Looper's
Delight!!

In Association with Amazon.com
Any purchase you make through these links gives Looper's Delight a commission to keep us going. If you are buying it anyway, why not let some of your cash go to your favorite web site? Thanks!!