Looper's Delight Archive Top (Search)
Date Index
Thread Index
Author Index
Support
Looper's
Delight!!

Looper's Delight Home
Mailing List Info
Looper's Delight
Looper Profiles
Tools of the Trade
Tips and Tricks
Musings
History of Looping
Loopography
Rec. Reading
Mailing List Info
Mailing List Archive
File Library

Support
Looper's Delight!
In Association with Amazon.com

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Real-time category



I for one really enjoyed this discussion, and feel that I've learned a
lot.  This is why this is such a great list--it certainly was not a
waste of bandwidth. Maybe someday I'll know enough to actually
participate in such a discussion. : )

On 12/9/05, Jeff Larson <Jeffrey.Larson@sun.com> wrote:
> Travis Hartnett wrote:
> > And what I've been trying to say is that "When using audio tools that
> > run on a PC, it's easy to bring any computer to a crawl, with
> > dedicated hardware there are design safeguards/limitations that
> > usually prevent this."
>
> I agree with this completely.  But I don't think this is how
> the thread got started.  I thought this started from the premise
> that it was impossible to perform MIDI command processing
> and synchronization accurately enough for Sensitive Real
> Musicians on a platform that wasn't running a real-time OS.
>
> If all this time we were just doing the "robustness"
> and "purpose built UI" debate then I've wasted a lot of
> bandwidth :-)
>
> Happy Holidays,
> Jeff
>
>


--
Art Simon
simart@null.net
http://art.simon.tripod.com
http://artsimon.iuma.com


Archive Top (Search) | Thread Index | Author Index
Looper's Delight Home | Looper's Delight Mailing List Info
This page is maintained by Kim Flint
contact us
Support
Looper's
Delight!!

In Association with Amazon.com
Any purchase you make through these links gives Looper's Delight a commission to keep us going. If you are buying it anyway, why not let some of your cash go to your favorite web site? Thanks!!