Looper's Delight Archive Top (Search)
Date Index
Thread Index
Author Index
Support
Looper's
Delight!!

Looper's Delight Home
Mailing List Info
Looper's Delight
Looper Profiles
Tools of the Trade
Tips and Tricks
Musings
History of Looping
Loopography
Rec. Reading
Mailing List Info
Mailing List Archive
File Library

Support
Looper's Delight!
In Association with Amazon.com

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: general question about equipment (dual core Hint)



This is just too funny; Andy's post popped up right when I was about  
to post a note about this:

>>> July 13th - Bidule 0.95 released
>>> A new version of Bidule has been released.
>>> New Features:
>>> - Added preliminary support for multicore processing... // (plus  
>>> a lot more)


As I a have many computers with both dual and single processors I can  
truly say that I have experienced a giant leap in performance every  
time a piece of software gets optimized for dual/multi core/cpu.  
Logic was first four years ago, recently Ableton and now Bidule. Bad  
news for me is that the dual cpu machine I have is stationary while  
the laptops I use for concerts are single cpu boxes. I can't wait  
until having saved up enough for getting an Intel Core 2 Duo box for  
my Bidule/Mobius live looping patch...

Per



On 4 aug 2007, at 13.02, andy butler wrote:

> My experiments on a dual core machine (winXP) showed the following.
>
> Using Bidule (not optimised for dual core) it becomes apparent that  
> all the Bidule processing is done by one of the cores.
>
> It also seems that the graphics for the operating system are handled
> in just one of the cores.
>
> WinXP chooses which processes to put onto which core, there doesn't  
> seem to be a way to change that.
>
> If the Bidule processing ends up on the same core as the graphic  
> processing,
> then Bidule has less capability.
>
> I guess it depends on the order that you start your applications,
> seemed like I could restart Bidule and get it onto the core
> which had the lowest load.
>
> andy butler
>
> disclaimer
> I don't have any specific knowledge about xp in this respect,
> just looking at the 'performance' tab of the Widows task manager.
> Krispen Hartung wrote:
>> You are correct. Software optimization for dual core is a bonus to  
>> take advantage of additional duo core features, but not necessary.  
>> The system does a lot of things in the background between the two  
>> cores, running  the OS and applications that make it much more  
>> efficient than a solo core system. Intel wouldn't release a  
>> product like this if it's power could only be unleashed by special  
>> software optimization.  That would be ridiculous.
>> Kris



Archive Top (Search) | Thread Index | Author Index
Looper's Delight Home | Looper's Delight Mailing List Info
This page is maintained by Kim Flint
contact us
Support
Looper's
Delight!!

In Association with Amazon.com
Any purchase you make through these links gives Looper's Delight a commission to keep us going. If you are buying it anyway, why not let some of your cash go to your favorite web site? Thanks!!
Please support Looper's Delight, buy something from Amazon!
Please support Looper's Delight, buy something from Amazon!